Smith And Wesson VTAC 2 Review

3000 Rounds Later- The Smith and Wesson VTAC 2

A couple of years ago, I purchased a Smith and Wesson VTAC  M&P15 from a coworker.  It became one of my favorite rifles pretty quickly. The rifle was spec’d by Kyle Lamb, head dude in charge over at Viking Tactics and is street ready.

A few months ago, I walked into my local gun shop and they had a VTAC 2 in stock.  I handled the rifle, and after some internal debate, I became the new owner of the VTAC 2.

I won’t go into the differences of the VTAC 1 and 2 but I will say that are significant.  The VTAC 2 comes standard with a Troy VTAC 13 inch rail system, a Geissele “Super V” trigger system, a VLTOR IMOD stock, a padded Vikings Tactics sling, a VTAC front sling adapter, VTAC light mount and all necessary hardware to  mount it all up.

To sum it up, the rifle is short the Surefire Fury, Aimpoint T1, a set of iron sights, and magazines from being the complete street ready semi-custom rifle.

My initial impressions of the VTAC 2 showed the same quality that Smith and Wesson rifles are known for.  My initial impression of shooting the rifle were even better.  I have long been a bit of hypocrite as it comes to the “custom” AR triggers.  A little custom work smoothing out a pistol trigger is ok, but if you couldn’t shoot a stock AR trigger you are some kind of girly man.  The Geissele Super V changed that.  I noticed compared to some of the other “speed” type triggers, that the Super V gives the shooter something to prep into.  Thus, making the shots faster, and more accurate.  Right before I began writing this article, I changed out the brake that comes on the VTAC 2 for a Surefire SOCOM.  At about 80 yards, I fired 20 rounds in about 10 seconds at a standard popper from standing.  I saw dirt fly on only one round and the rest hit the popper at that speed.  Color me really impressed.

For a police officer who trains, and could milk the rifle for what it is worth, it is a great value.  The thing that stuck out to me is that for the $1600 or so that you can find these guns for, when you add up the accessories, you can’t build one yourself for that price.  It is a great value for a street rifle.  The other potential advantage is the ability to have a semi-custom rifle as being “factory” to satisfy department regulations for some officers.

The rifle currently has about 3,000 rounds down the pipe.  About half that was put down range by a student at a class after his rifle went down hard.

I am really impressed with the VTAC 2 and would recommend it to anyone who wants a bit of custom tweaking in a factory, street ready rifle.  I ditched the A2 pistol grip and charging handle for a BCM, added the Magpul trigger guard, and gave it a coat of Aervoe.  While the changes were not necessary to have a great rifle out of the box, I like the ability to have minor tweaks to make a good rifle better.   It is now my primary training rifle.  I’ll check back in around the 5,000 round mark.

Stock In, Stock Out

photo(10)

 

http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=8912

 

Every so often certain techniques seem to swap around in the shooting community.  Almost like this week the Surgeon General says that salt is good for you, where last week salt was bad for you.  The whole stock in or stock fully extended thing seems to follow it pretty closely.

In the late 1990′s, it seemed to be all the rage to run the collapsible stock all the way collapsed.  The train of thought was that you could place the stock on the inside of the straps of your body armor.  It also assisted you in one handed shooting, and lessened the arc of movement between shooting from either shoulder as the problem required.

Today there seems to be a great push to run the stock all the way out.  The idea behind it is that the stock all the way out give you better leverage on the gun.  The added benefits is that when you go prone you don’t have to extend the stock out to mount the gun properly.  If you look at all the guys that shoot 3 Gun for a living, they are running the stock all the way out to gather that extra leverage.

My personal belief is this.  Neither are correct for every rifle, and every shooter.

Some of my rifles I can get away with running the stock fully extended.  Some of my rifles I have to run them one click in.  I’ve observed students who simply can’t run the stock all the way out.  I think that the individual shooter should practice so basic core drills like one and two shots from the low ready, one and two shots from the high ready, and a Bill Drill or two.  Based upon what their dot track and gun handling are doing, they can adjust the stock one click in or out depending up their needs.

I do think that running the stock further out has benefits that can’t be denied.  It just isn’t one sized fits all………

MODERN SERVICE WEAPONS REVIEW- VG6 Comp

http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=8628

 

photo(6)

 

 

I am a new guy when it comes to muzzle brakes.  I’ve spent my career shooting “whatever” came on the end of the rifle.  And that “whatever” has always came in the form of a good old fashion A2 flash hider.

About six or eight months ago, a coworker brought a rifle he built to shoot 3 gun to the range one afternoon.  It was a standard sixteen inch rifle with a carbine length gas system.  The muzzle device was a VG6 Gamma 556 muzzle brake.  I noticed pretty quickly that the brake wasn’t obnoxious like some of the ones I’ve had in classes.  From shooting his rifle, doing dot track drills were a snap as the dot didn’t move outside of the three by five card I was shooting into.  The dot had a slight track upwards and promptly returned to the specific point on the card I was aiming into.  I wanted one for my next rifle, so I purchased it.

Along came my next purchase.  A Smith and Wesson VTAC 2.  A sixteen inch AR with a mid length gas system.  I shot a couple of hundred rounds with the brake that came on the gun, and then swapped it out for the Gamma 556.

I headed to the range to shoot some dot track drills and some speed stuff.  Oddly, the recoil impulse was nothing like the 16 inch carbine length AR of my coworker.  In tracking the dot through recoil, the dot actually drops to the bottom of the card instead of a slight rise.  The only thing I can attribute the difference to is the mid length gas system, versus the carbine length.  I had several other shooters run some drills with the gun, and they all saw the same results.

I loaned the rifle to a student for a 1500 round Carbine Operator course a couple of weekends ago.  He stated that once you got used to the drop versus the muzzle rising, the gun was very easy to shoot.  I had two other students with VTAC 2′s who both had the SureFire Socom brake on them.  They gave the exact, almost neutral track that I personally like on an AR-15 without being overly obnoxious. I promptly came back and ordered a SureFire Socom.  I placed the Gamma 556 on a carbine length Colt 6920 and it went right back to that predictable slight rise I had witnessed on my coworkers rifle.

The future of the Gamma 556?  It will go on a piston gun next to see what the recoil impulse is like before it probably finds a permanent home on a carbine length DI gun.  The cost of the Gamma 556 is around $85.00 and is available directly from VG6 Precision.

Friday Karma- Go to our Facebook Page and take a guess.

photo(7)

 

Go to our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/opspectraining and take a guess at what is going on in this photo.  Two winners will be selected to win a couple of disk 1 SIG SAUER Armorer DVDs.

Successful three days of training in Massachusetts (Photos)

OpSpec Training instructor Bruce Gray visited Franklin County Sportsmen’s Club in Deerfield, Massachusetts for three training days, offering the Introduction to Practical Fundamentals and Practical Fundamentals class the first weekend in May. Ten students enrolled in the Intro class, and 13 attended the two-day Practical Fundamentals class. Many students took advantage of all three days of training.

Operation Specific Training will be at 2013 NRA Show!

Operation Specific Training will be at Booth 2505 at the 2013 NRA Show in Houston, TX this weekend.  Stop by and say Hello!

SKD PIG Plate Carrier- REVIEW

AS PREVIOUSLY POSTED ON MSW-

http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=2605

SKD “PIG” Plate Carrier- A Review

We currently issue the PPI Operator vest at work.  We’ve been looking at and testing various vests, and plate carrier rigs for our next vest replacement which comes up in 2014.

In comes the “PIG” (Patrol Incident gear) plate carrier from SKD Tactical. (http://www.skdtac.com/PIG-Plate-Carrier-p/pig.502.htm).  One of my coworkers purchased this plate carrier, set it up and we started testing it.  The first thing I noticed about it was the reasonable price.  The carrier ran about $340 shipped.  SKD’s website boasts that their product’s ship in one business day or it ships free.

The vest itself is very well constructed.  A couple of the features really struck me.  First off, the carrier is one size fits all.  Usually, I turn my nose up when I read stuff like that.  One size fits all doesn’t work out for me in hats, why would it work out in a life saving device.  The features that allow this vest to be one size fits all are pretty ingenious.  The plates, regardless of size are held into the plate pockets by runners.  Once the plates are positioned, the plates are assisted into place by velcro on each side to keep them from moving.  Any size plate will work, and will be held into proper position to provide the level of coverage of whatever plate you have on hand.  It has dedicated pockets for vest backers to soft armor inserts as well.

The carrier is sized to the individual operator in a couple of ways.  The carrier has two adjustment straps that cinch the vest up or down to provide the right fit below the neck.  These tie into the quick release buckles on the shoulder straps and velcro neatly into place.  Pretty slick design actually.  The shoulder straps are always the weak point to me in any vest.  I like a vest I can run in.  And the generous padding in the shoulder straps make the PIG plate carrier a breeze to run in.  The cummerbund design ensures the proper fit around the operator.  It is pretty standard as to how most cummerbunds are on the mainstream heavy vest/plate carrier designs out there.  It also has ample back padding which is a plus for wearing it long hours.

My favorite feature on this carrier is the split cummerbund design.  The design is more user friendly than that of the other vests/carriers on the market.  It  greatly speeds donning the vest during those middle of the night, from a sound sleep to “hey, how’d I get to this barricade” type call outs.

I think the bottom line is a good, lightweight set of plates can make or break a carrier.  But, the “PIG” plate carrier seems good to go with older, heavier plates that are more cumbersome.

If you are considering buying a plate carrier, in my opinion, you can’t beat the “PIG” for the money.  In the coming months, look for more on the PIG plate carrier, as well as reviews of other manufacturers carriers as I collect impressions and data.

OpSpec Training Adds two new classes to the fall schedule. More to come.

Operation Specific Training has added two new classes to the fall schedule.  We hope that the worst is behind us on the great gun scare of 2013, and would like to thank the President and Joe Biden for their fund raising efforts for the NRA, and their efforts in boosting gun sales, as that is about all they managed to do.

With that being said, we have added two new offerings to the fall schedule.  San Diego, CA (Pala Range) and Piru, CA.    We hope to also have two other classes to add in the near future, and that will round out the 2013 schedule.  In about August, we will begin work on the 2014 schedule.  The ’14 schedule will hopefully reflect our normal operational tempo.

Thanks to all that support us!

Surefire X300 Review

As previously published on Modern Service Weapons.

http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=2571

 

Review- Sure Fire X300 Ultra Weapon Mounted Light

Sure Fire X300 Ultra mounted on author’s duty Glock 35

I am a flashlight nerd.  I admit it.  I’d almost go to meetings like any other addiction if it was offered.  I am constantly on the hunt for the next biggest and brightest thing.  I’ve often stated that I am waiting around for the light to come out that has the same performance on the human body as to when the Germans looked into the Ark of the Covenant on Raiders of the Lost Ark.  Real old Testament stuff.

So when James Otto of Otto Firearms contacted me and stated he had the new Sure Fire X300 Ultra in stock finally, I broke out the plastic and one was on its way.

I did all of the research.  Sure Fire’s website (www.surefire.com) boasts that the 500 lumen output and it made me giddy waiting for the arrival of the unit.  The website also showed the length dimensions to be the same for what I could tell as the standard X300.  Another win, it’ll fit in all of my holsters.

When the light arrived, I noticed it shared the same quality of all of my other Surefire lights.  Great craftsmanship, fit and finish, and the dang thing is BRIGHT.  I quickly got my duty pistol, detached the issued TLR-1 and installed the X300 Ultra.  The X300 Ultra appeared to be a lot longer than the TLR-1.  Oh well, not a deal breaker.  I had accounted for the difference in bezel diameter by the fact that all of our issued  holsters will fit a larger M3.  Not an issue.  When I put the pistol in the holster, the extra length of the light was noticeable.  The ALS system did not want to lock without extra effort.  And conversely, it didn’t want to unlock without extra effort.  I simply removed the plastic cap on the bottom of the holsters that “protects” the lights, keeps crap from entering the bottom of the holster, and all was well.

That is the bad.  It may not fit in some holsters without minor modification.  The good is the noticeable difference in 500 lumens of output vice what you get on the standard Sure Fire X300 or the Streamlight TLR-1.  When the put them side by side in a dark room, the difference is…..ahem…..night and day.  The X300 Ultra dominates all comers in low light or no light.  Not only does it fill a room with more light, makes it simpler to “wash” non-targets with light to identify them, you also see a noticeable difference at 50 yards with the amount of illumination this torch puts out.  I also think that mounting one at the 12 O’ clock rail position on the FNH SCAR line of rifles might be the lighting answer I have been searching for.  I am a big fan of the SCAR 17, but figuring out the lighting to match my shooting style without the addition of an extended rail system has been a challenge.

Sure Fire weapon mounted lights have come a long way since the early days of my career.   Back when most pistol lights were considered crew served weapons because of their size.  Technology is getting smaller, brighter and cheaper.  And I for one am a happy dude because of it.

Check out the Sure Fire X300 Ultra.  You will not be disappointed.

Reflections on Practical Fundamentals: How my front sight went from foe to friend

This is a guest post from one of our recent students who took the Practical Fundamentals class with us.

“The right art,” cried the Master, “is purposeless, aimless! The more obstinately you try to learn how to shoot the arrow for the sake of hitting the goal, the less you will succeed in the one and the further the other will recede. What stands in your way is that you have a much too willful will. You think that what you do not do yourself does not happen.” – Zen in the Art of Archery

I’m a peculiar kind of shooter. Though I’ve been shooting pistols for over a decade now, at times with great dedication, and able to occasionally perform at IDPA’s Expert level, every pull of the trigger is an exercise in self-doubt. I’ve been schooled, through independent reading and hands-on instruction, in the oft repeated basics of marksmanship: focus on your sights; don’t flinch, don’t jerk the trigger; press the trigger; don’t anticipate; let it surprise you; let your breath fall out of you; relax your grip; move your trigger finger independently; establish your master grip; establish your base; etc… etc… etc. The truth is that for as long as I’ve been shooting, I haven’t had any faith in the process. After all, the target yielded the real truth about myself as a shooter. Because the target was not always successfully hit, I regarded each trigger pull as an opportunity to fail.

Since every sight picture was another possible failure, I would try to cheat. I would close one eye. I would hide my non-dominant eye behind the curved bill of my cap. I would hold my breath. I would strain my grip. I would adjust and re-adjust my sight picture. I would snatch at the trigger when the sights looked just right, as if I could catch that front sight, wobbling ever so slightly within its notch, unawares. The results were totally predictable: my practical accuracy was not only poor, it was slow. And the greater the pressure to perform, the worse I did. It’s no wonder that I subconsciously grew to have an ambivalent feeling towards the appearance of my sights. I knew that I needed them, but I somehow felt abused by them, betrayed by them. It was a dysfunctional relationship.

For the most part, my training was results-oriented. Practical Fundamentals is almost entirely process-oriented. The class’ chief process of concern is mastering the trigger. Unlike other classes which gloss over trigger control with vague descriptions and an emphasis on what not to do, Bruce Gray and Jerry Jones provide detailed instruction on the hows of trigger control at speed. These fundamentals are immediately put into practice and re-emphasized with every press of the trigger over the 2 day course. This was not the first time I had heard of prepping the trigger, nor the first time I had practiced it. The prescribed drills, however, had me using the technique well enough that it started to become automatic. I was able to run the trigger better, and less deliberately, than I had before. From there, a number of profound changes came over my shooting. Though I didn’t immediately recognize it, my sights and I had entered relationship counseling, and it would pay dividends.

The first small step towards reconciliation took place over some simple rapid strings at a single target. As I watched the front sight lift and return to its notch, I noted that I wasn’t straining. I wasn’t fighting the gun. I wasn’t jumping on the trigger. The trigger, after all, was ready to go. I was… waiting. I was just waiting for the sight picture to announce when the next shot would be let go. I had become an observer.

The practical effects of this shift were slight: my speed picked up a bit; my accuracy appeared to remain adequate (OpSpec makes no great efforts to ensure you can see where you’ve hit, leaving ragged targets up beyond what some would consider an adequate tour of duty. While this practice may have some detractors, this forces the student to pay attention to the only dynamic object of interest – your sights.) The mental effects were much more significant. I was able to relax and look. What I saw next was again something I should have seen long ago, but hadn’t.

How many times had I been told to call my shots? I thought I was, if calling your shots meant making an educated guess as to where your round landed. As it is always easier to know when you’ve flubbed a shot than got it right, perhaps it’s more accurate to say I was calling my misses. “I pulled that shot… I broke early… my sights weren’t aligned…” Mentally, this was an active process. The defining moment for me came during a transitions drill. Swinging left I saw the front sight lift just short of the obliterated center that was my goal. Amazingly, as I moved to recover the pistol, a saw a crisp hole precisely where that sight lifted. Precisely. Now that my trigger pulls weren’t confounding the picture my sights could be trusted to tell me what was really going on. Rather than actively guessing which shots were misses, I was passively watching the sights deliver all the information I needed. As we moved on to Mozambiques, I was waiting for my sights to appear over the head for the 3rd round, but I also trusted that it was right to fire as soon as it arrived. The results were quicker, cleaner hits without any of the anxiety. It was an emotional breakthrough.

The capstone lesson occurred during something of a parlor trick. Bruce and Jerry went down the line and one at a time pressed the trigger while you aligned the sights. If there is a horse-whisperer equivalent for shooting instructors, Jerry might be it. This man who generally wears very little expression on his face, looking like he might need another cup of coffee, puts a hand on your shoulder, and facing slightly up-range, gently coaxes the shooter with soft words into just watching the sights. The shot goes off and the sweet, low entreaties resume for another 4 shots. The groups are generally the best of the course. But while most shooters were impressed by the mechanical accuracy of their gun and the fact that with proper trigger control such groups were possible, my thoughts were a slight tangent: the front sight was dancing all over that target. He couldn’t see it, he didn’t decide when to break the shot, yet the group stayed tight. Well, that was it. Not only could I trust my sights when they were behaving well, but the small wobbles I formerly thought would have a dramatic effect on my accuracy were in fact a false demon of my own conjuring.

The few of you who have made it through this lengthy reflection may be left wondering how any of this was news to me. After all, I’ve been shooting for a while in practical settings. I left Practical Fundamentals wondering the same thing. My embarrassing realization was that I didn’t know what the fundamentals of practical shooting really were, or how profound a difference proper trigger management would make on my performance. I knew all of the catch phrases and theories. But when it came time to practice, I focused on all of the other skills I mistakenly thought were fundamental to shooting well: draws, rapid sight acquisition, static dry fire, doubles, reloads, malfunction drills. I practiced this stuff long and hard, and became just good enough to think I was on the right track. I was wrong. Without the most basic skill, perfect trigger management, the rest will only get you to a false ceiling. OpSpec’s Practical Fundamentals is not about burning through more powder than the other guys, nor about showing you the latest tactic to be a slick gunslinger. It delivers a platform by which shooters may know their true potential. I certainly wasn’t the best shooter on the line, but next time I see Bruce and Jerry, I can guarantee I’ll be the best shooter I’ve ever been. I like that.